中国水稻科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 391-399.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.6146 391
秦俭1,2, 杨志远2, 孙永健2, 徐徽2, 吕腾飞2, 代邹2, 郑家奎1, 蒋开锋1, 马均2,*()
收稿日期:
2016-11-06
修回日期:
2017-02-12
出版日期:
2017-07-25
发布日期:
2017-07-10
通讯作者:
马均
基金资助:
Jian QIN1,2, Zhiyuan YANG2, Yongjian SUN2, Hui XU2, Tengfei LÜ2, Zou DAI2, Jiakui ZHENG1, Kaifeng JIANG1, Jun MA2,*()
Received:
2016-11-06
Revised:
2017-02-12
Online:
2017-07-25
Published:
2017-07-10
Contact:
Jun MA
摘要:
目的为探究氮素穗肥不同促花肥和保花肥比例对水稻光合生产和产量的影响,并为水稻氮素穗肥管理提供依据,【方法】以株型和产量均存在较大差异的2个杂交中稻品种(德香4103和宜香3724)为材料,在常规施氮量(180 kg/hm2)下,研究了占总氮40%的穗肥不同促花肥和保花肥运筹比例(1∶3, 2∶2, 3∶1, 4∶0)对水稻叶片生长、形态、光合生产及产量的影响。结果2个水稻品种均在低促花肥、高保花肥时(1∶3)表现出叶片直立、受光形态好,净光合速率高和群体干物质积累量大的特点,并最终获得较高产量;而在高促花肥、低保花肥下,2个水稻品种的剑叶、倒2叶叶面积和叶角增大,披垂度增加,群体质量变差,结实率和粒重下降,产量降低。德香4103因其颖花量较大,上3叶叶面积和总叶面积相对适宜,粒叶比高,且在不同穗肥运筹下叶面积和叶角变幅较小,因而受光姿态和群体质量更优,干物质积累量更大,产量更高。结论水稻氮素穗肥运筹应塑造良好叶片形态和群体质量,并增加花后物质积累量才能有助于产量提高;并对水稻株叶型选育进行了探讨。
中图分类号:
秦俭, 杨志远, 孙永健, 徐徽, 吕腾飞, 代邹, 郑家奎, 蒋开锋, 马均. 氮素穗肥运筹对两个杂交中籼稻叶片形态、光合生产及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(4): 391-399.
Jian QIN, Zhiyuan YANG, Yongjian SUN, Hui XU, Tengfei LÜ, Zou DAI, Jiakui ZHENG, Kaifeng JIANG, Jun MA. Effects of Nitrogen Topdressing for Panicle Initiation on Leaf Morphology, Photosynthetic Production and Grain Yield of Two Middle-season Hybrid Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2017, 31(4): 391-399.
全氮 Total N content/(g·kg-1) | 有机质 Organic matter/(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Available N content/(g·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available P content/(g·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K content/(g·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1.76 | 29.15 | 157.54 | 39.81 | 80.65 |
表 1 试验田土壤基础肥力
Table 1 . Basic soil fertility of the experimental field.
全氮 Total N content/(g·kg-1) | 有机质 Organic matter/(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Available N content/(g·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available P content/(g·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K content/(g·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1.76 | 29.15 | 157.54 | 39.81 | 80.65 |
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥处理 Nitrogen application for panicle initiation | 剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长 Length/cm | 宽 Width/cm | 面积 Area/cm2 | 长 Length/cm | 宽 Width/cm | 面积 Area/cm2 | 长 Length/cm | 宽 Width/cm | 面积 Area/cm2 | |||||
C1 | N1 | 35.0 b | 2.5 a | 61.3 d | 44.4 a | 2.3 a | 71.5 b | 48.6 a | 2.0 a | 67.9 b | |||
N2 | 35.3 b | 2.6 a | 64.2 c | 44.6 a | 2.3 a | 71.8 b | 48.4 a | 2.0 a | 67.8 b | ||||
N3 | 38.9 a | 2.6 a | 70.8 b | 45.4 a | 2.3 a | 73.1 ab | 48.4 a | 2.0 a | 67.8 b | ||||
N4 | 39.4 a | 2.7 a | 74.5 a | 45.4 a | 2.4 a | 76.3 a | 48.4 a | 2.1 a | 71.1 a | ||||
平均值Average | 37.1 | 2.6 | 67.7 | 44.5 | 2.3 | 73.2 | 48.4 | 2.0 | 68.7 | ||||
C2 | N1 | 36.8 c | 2.4 a | 61.8 c | 51.5 b | 2.2 a | 79.3 c | 55.1 a | 2.0 a | 77.1 a | |||
N2 | 40.5 b | 2.5 a | 70.9 b | 51.9 b | 2.3 a | 83.6 b | 55.9 a | 2.0 a | 78.3 a | ||||
N3 | 40.5 b | 2.5 a | 70.9 b | 52.2 ab | 2.3 a | 84.0 b | 55.8 a | 2.0 a | 78.1 a | ||||
N4 | 45.1 a | 2.6 a | 82.1 a | 54.3 a | 2.3 a | 87.4 a | 57.0 a | 2.1 a | 83.8 a | ||||
平均值Average | 40.7 | 2.5 | 71.4 | 52.5 | 2.3 | 83.6 | 56.0 | 2.0 | 79.3 | ||||
F值 F-value | 品种 C | 159.5** | 1.84 | 32.92** | 244.4** | 0.66 | 220.8** | 301.4** | 0.52 | 209.8** | |||
穗肥 N | 90.52** | 1.55 | 81.53** | 2.92 | 2.15 | 14.52** | 0.75 | 0.23 | 9.93* | ||||
C×N | 15.25** | 0.02 | 6.52* | 0.95 | 1.51 | 1.61 | 0.81 | 0.67 | 0.71 |
表 2 氮素穗肥运筹对上3叶叶长、叶宽及面积的影响
Table 2 Effects of nitrogen topdressing for panide initiation on leaf length, width and area of the uppermost three leaves in rice.
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥处理 Nitrogen application for panicle initiation | 剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长 Length/cm | 宽 Width/cm | 面积 Area/cm2 | 长 Length/cm | 宽 Width/cm | 面积 Area/cm2 | 长 Length/cm | 宽 Width/cm | 面积 Area/cm2 | |||||
C1 | N1 | 35.0 b | 2.5 a | 61.3 d | 44.4 a | 2.3 a | 71.5 b | 48.6 a | 2.0 a | 67.9 b | |||
N2 | 35.3 b | 2.6 a | 64.2 c | 44.6 a | 2.3 a | 71.8 b | 48.4 a | 2.0 a | 67.8 b | ||||
N3 | 38.9 a | 2.6 a | 70.8 b | 45.4 a | 2.3 a | 73.1 ab | 48.4 a | 2.0 a | 67.8 b | ||||
N4 | 39.4 a | 2.7 a | 74.5 a | 45.4 a | 2.4 a | 76.3 a | 48.4 a | 2.1 a | 71.1 a | ||||
平均值Average | 37.1 | 2.6 | 67.7 | 44.5 | 2.3 | 73.2 | 48.4 | 2.0 | 68.7 | ||||
C2 | N1 | 36.8 c | 2.4 a | 61.8 c | 51.5 b | 2.2 a | 79.3 c | 55.1 a | 2.0 a | 77.1 a | |||
N2 | 40.5 b | 2.5 a | 70.9 b | 51.9 b | 2.3 a | 83.6 b | 55.9 a | 2.0 a | 78.3 a | ||||
N3 | 40.5 b | 2.5 a | 70.9 b | 52.2 ab | 2.3 a | 84.0 b | 55.8 a | 2.0 a | 78.1 a | ||||
N4 | 45.1 a | 2.6 a | 82.1 a | 54.3 a | 2.3 a | 87.4 a | 57.0 a | 2.1 a | 83.8 a | ||||
平均值Average | 40.7 | 2.5 | 71.4 | 52.5 | 2.3 | 83.6 | 56.0 | 2.0 | 79.3 | ||||
F值 F-value | 品种 C | 159.5** | 1.84 | 32.92** | 244.4** | 0.66 | 220.8** | 301.4** | 0.52 | 209.8** | |||
穗肥 N | 90.52** | 1.55 | 81.53** | 2.92 | 2.15 | 14.52** | 0.75 | 0.23 | 9.93* | ||||
C×N | 15.25** | 0.02 | 6.52* | 0.95 | 1.51 | 1.61 | 0.81 | 0.67 | 0.71 |
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥处理 Nitrogen application For panicle initiation | 基角Basic angle/° | 开张角Stretch angle/° | 披垂角 Droop angle/° | 透光率 LTR/% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | 剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | 剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | |||||
C1 | N1 | 14.5 | 20.8 | 26.0 | 19.1 | 26.1 | 29.6 | 4.6 | 5.3 | 3.6 | 3.24 | ||
N2 | 16.4 | 22.5 | 28.0 | 30.2 | 30.4 | 31.1 | 13.8 | 7.9 | 3.1 | 2.78 | |||
N3 | 15.1 | 21.7 | 27.7 | 47.6 | 34.4 | 30.7 | 32.5 | 12.7 | 3.0 | 2.19 | |||
N4 | 16.2 | 19.7 | 26.2 | 50.5 | 34.6 | 29.3 | 34.3 | 14.9 | 3.1 | 1.58 | |||
平均值Average | 15.6 | 21.2 | 27.0 | 36.9 | 31.4 | 30.2 | 21.3 | 10.2 | 3.2 | 2.45 | |||
C2 | N1 | 10.8 | 17.5 | 23.3 | 12.5 | 25.6 | 30.7 | 1.7 | 8.1 | 7.4 | 3.55 | ||
N2 | 16.1 | 18.8 | 25.4 | 25.8 | 26.9 | 33.5 | 9.7 | 8.1 | 8.1 | 2.59 | |||
N3 | 20.5 | 25.1 | 27.2 | 60.5 | 42.7 | 39.2 | 40.0 | 17.6 | 12.0 | 1.50 | |||
N4 | 21.6 | 24.1 | 29.3 | 63.3 | 43.2 | 43.5 | 41.7 | 19.1 | 14.2 | 1.12 | |||
平均值Average | 17.3 | 21.4 | 26.3 | 40.5 | 34.6 | 36.7 | 23.3 | 13.2 | 10.4 | 2.19 |
表 3 氮素穗肥运筹对叶片叶角和群体透光的影响
Table 3 Effects of nitrogen application for panicle initiation on leaf angle and light transmittance ratio.
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥处理 Nitrogen application For panicle initiation | 基角Basic angle/° | 开张角Stretch angle/° | 披垂角 Droop angle/° | 透光率 LTR/% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | 剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | 剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | |||||
C1 | N1 | 14.5 | 20.8 | 26.0 | 19.1 | 26.1 | 29.6 | 4.6 | 5.3 | 3.6 | 3.24 | ||
N2 | 16.4 | 22.5 | 28.0 | 30.2 | 30.4 | 31.1 | 13.8 | 7.9 | 3.1 | 2.78 | |||
N3 | 15.1 | 21.7 | 27.7 | 47.6 | 34.4 | 30.7 | 32.5 | 12.7 | 3.0 | 2.19 | |||
N4 | 16.2 | 19.7 | 26.2 | 50.5 | 34.6 | 29.3 | 34.3 | 14.9 | 3.1 | 1.58 | |||
平均值Average | 15.6 | 21.2 | 27.0 | 36.9 | 31.4 | 30.2 | 21.3 | 10.2 | 3.2 | 2.45 | |||
C2 | N1 | 10.8 | 17.5 | 23.3 | 12.5 | 25.6 | 30.7 | 1.7 | 8.1 | 7.4 | 3.55 | ||
N2 | 16.1 | 18.8 | 25.4 | 25.8 | 26.9 | 33.5 | 9.7 | 8.1 | 8.1 | 2.59 | |||
N3 | 20.5 | 25.1 | 27.2 | 60.5 | 42.7 | 39.2 | 40.0 | 17.6 | 12.0 | 1.50 | |||
N4 | 21.6 | 24.1 | 29.3 | 63.3 | 43.2 | 43.5 | 41.7 | 19.1 | 14.2 | 1.12 | |||
平均值Average | 17.3 | 21.4 | 26.3 | 40.5 | 34.6 | 36.7 | 23.3 | 13.2 | 10.4 | 2.19 |
图 1 氮素穗肥运筹对齐穗后7 d上3叶净光合速率(Pn)的影响
Fig. 1. Effects of nitrogen application for panicle initiation on photosynthetic rate of uppermost three leaves at the seventh day after heading.
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥处理 Nitrogen application for panicle initiation | 齐穗期 Heading stage | 成熟期叶面积指数 LAI 2 | 叶面积衰减率 LDR/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上三叶面积指数 LAI 1 | 总叶面积指数 LAI t | LAI 1/LAI t (%) | ||||
C1 | N1 | 5.10 c | 8.00 c | 63.7 b | 5.31 a | 33.6 c |
N2 | 5.16 c | 8.03 c | 64.3 b | 5.15 a | 35.9 c | |
N3 | 5.47 b | 8.52 b | 64.3 b | 4.21 b | 50.6 b | |
N4 | 6.51 a | 9.97 a | 65.3 a | 4.01 b | 59.8 a | |
平均值Average | 5.48 | 8.63 | 64.4 | 4.67 | 45.0 | |
C2 | N1 | 5.09 c | 8.00 c | 63.7 b | 5.11 a | 36.1 c |
N2 | 5.75 b | 8.79 b | 65.4 a | 5.34 a | 39.2 c | |
N3 | 5.82 b | 8.90 b | 65.4 a | 4.64 b | 47.8 b | |
N4 | 6.71 a | 10.16 a | 66.0 a | 3.85 c | 62.1 a | |
平均值Average | 5.79 | 8.96 | 65.1 | 4.74 | 46.3 | |
F值F-value | C | 55.93* | 10.60* | 3.84 | 0.66 | 1.49 |
N | 127.6** | 77.35** | 12.12** | 18.45** | 51.21** | |
C×N | 6.72** | 2.60 | 1.28 | 1.02 | 0.70 |
表4 氮素穗肥运筹对叶面积的影响
Table 4 Effects of nitrogen application for panicle initiation on of leaf area.
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥处理 Nitrogen application for panicle initiation | 齐穗期 Heading stage | 成熟期叶面积指数 LAI 2 | 叶面积衰减率 LDR/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上三叶面积指数 LAI 1 | 总叶面积指数 LAI t | LAI 1/LAI t (%) | ||||
C1 | N1 | 5.10 c | 8.00 c | 63.7 b | 5.31 a | 33.6 c |
N2 | 5.16 c | 8.03 c | 64.3 b | 5.15 a | 35.9 c | |
N3 | 5.47 b | 8.52 b | 64.3 b | 4.21 b | 50.6 b | |
N4 | 6.51 a | 9.97 a | 65.3 a | 4.01 b | 59.8 a | |
平均值Average | 5.48 | 8.63 | 64.4 | 4.67 | 45.0 | |
C2 | N1 | 5.09 c | 8.00 c | 63.7 b | 5.11 a | 36.1 c |
N2 | 5.75 b | 8.79 b | 65.4 a | 5.34 a | 39.2 c | |
N3 | 5.82 b | 8.90 b | 65.4 a | 4.64 b | 47.8 b | |
N4 | 6.71 a | 10.16 a | 66.0 a | 3.85 c | 62.1 a | |
平均值Average | 5.79 | 8.96 | 65.1 | 4.74 | 46.3 | |
F值F-value | C | 55.93* | 10.60* | 3.84 | 0.66 | 1.49 |
N | 127.6** | 77.35** | 12.12** | 18.45** | 51.21** | |
C×N | 6.72** | 2.60 | 1.28 | 1.02 | 0.70 |
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥运筹 Nitrogen application for panicle initiation | 干物质积累 DA/(kg·hm-2) | 茎叶干物 质输出量 ESL/kg·hm-2 | 茎叶干物 质输出率 EPSL/% | 茎叶干物 质贡献率 CPSL/% | 收获指数 HI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Mature | 抽穗-成熟 Heading to mature | ||||||
C1 | N1 | 11 112.0 b | 18 234.5 a | 7 122.5 a | 1 499.4 c | 16.37 c | 14.19 c | 0.527 a |
N2 | 11 559.0 ab | 18 130.8 a | 6 571.0 ab | 1 807.8 b | 18.80 b | 17.55 b | 0.514 b | |
N3 | 11 806.2 a | 18 119.4 a | 6 313.2 b | 2 090.4 a | 20.91 a | 20.47 a | 0.505 c | |
N4 | 12 045.3 a | 18 085.6 a | 5 863.6 b | 2 252.4 a | 21.97 a | 22.29 a | 0.501 c | |
平均值Average | 11 630.6 | 18 138.8 | 6 467.6 | 1 912.5 | 19.51 | 18.63 | 0.512 | |
C2 | N1 | 10 638.0 b | 17 363.9 a | 6 726.0 a | 976.8 b | 10.89 b | 10.47 b | 0.487 a |
N2 | 11 036.6 ab | 17 177.2 a | 6 140.7 ab | 1 287.0 a | 14.70 a | 15.03 a | 0.479 a | |
N3 | 11 474.4 a | 17 457.7 a | 5 983.3 b | 1 380.0 a | 13.21 a | 14.28 a | 0.465 b | |
N4 | 11 570.1 a | 17 398.5 a | 5 828.4 b | 1 449.1 a | 14.53 a | 16.34 a | 0.462 b | |
平均值Average | 11 179.7 | 17 349.4 | 6 169.6 | 1 273.2 | 13.33 | 14.03 | 0.473 | |
F值F-value | C | 25.8* | 19.94* | 14.44 | 141.8** | 125.0** | 75.95* | 267.0** |
N | 5.30* | 0.04 | 5.45* | 22.24** | 11.85** | 26.73** | 28.57** | |
C×N | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 3.10 | 2.22 | 2.44 | 0.45 |
表5 氮素穗肥运筹对干物质积累与同化物转运的影响
Table 5 Effects of nitrogen application for panicle initiation on dry matter accumulation(DA) and transformation of assimilative products.
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥运筹 Nitrogen application for panicle initiation | 干物质积累 DA/(kg·hm-2) | 茎叶干物 质输出量 ESL/kg·hm-2 | 茎叶干物 质输出率 EPSL/% | 茎叶干物 质贡献率 CPSL/% | 收获指数 HI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Mature | 抽穗-成熟 Heading to mature | ||||||
C1 | N1 | 11 112.0 b | 18 234.5 a | 7 122.5 a | 1 499.4 c | 16.37 c | 14.19 c | 0.527 a |
N2 | 11 559.0 ab | 18 130.8 a | 6 571.0 ab | 1 807.8 b | 18.80 b | 17.55 b | 0.514 b | |
N3 | 11 806.2 a | 18 119.4 a | 6 313.2 b | 2 090.4 a | 20.91 a | 20.47 a | 0.505 c | |
N4 | 12 045.3 a | 18 085.6 a | 5 863.6 b | 2 252.4 a | 21.97 a | 22.29 a | 0.501 c | |
平均值Average | 11 630.6 | 18 138.8 | 6 467.6 | 1 912.5 | 19.51 | 18.63 | 0.512 | |
C2 | N1 | 10 638.0 b | 17 363.9 a | 6 726.0 a | 976.8 b | 10.89 b | 10.47 b | 0.487 a |
N2 | 11 036.6 ab | 17 177.2 a | 6 140.7 ab | 1 287.0 a | 14.70 a | 15.03 a | 0.479 a | |
N3 | 11 474.4 a | 17 457.7 a | 5 983.3 b | 1 380.0 a | 13.21 a | 14.28 a | 0.465 b | |
N4 | 11 570.1 a | 17 398.5 a | 5 828.4 b | 1 449.1 a | 14.53 a | 16.34 a | 0.462 b | |
平均值Average | 11 179.7 | 17 349.4 | 6 169.6 | 1 273.2 | 13.33 | 14.03 | 0.473 | |
F值F-value | C | 25.8* | 19.94* | 14.44 | 141.8** | 125.0** | 75.95* | 267.0** |
N | 5.30* | 0.04 | 5.45* | 22.24** | 11.85** | 26.73** | 28.57** | |
C×N | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 3.10 | 2.22 | 2.44 | 0.45 |
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥运筹 Nitrogen application for panicle initiation | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 No. of spiklets per panicle | 总颖花量 Total spikelets /(×104·hm-2) | 结实率 Seed-setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 实际产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | N1 | 228.0 b | 162.4 a | 37 027 a | 87.6 a | 31.31 a | 9 652.9 a |
N2 | 228.6 b | 159.3 a | 36 529 a | 86.4 a | 30.88 b | 9 295.3 b | |
N3 | 240.6 a | 151.8 b | 36 371 a | 84.9 b | 30.56 bc | 9 109.9 b | |
N4 | 231.0 b | 158.8 a | 36 609 a | 84.8 b | 30.01 c | 9 068.0 b | |
平均值Average | 232.1 | 158.2 | 36 634 | 85.9 | 30.69 | 9 281.5 | |
C2 | N1 | 220.8 a | 143.5 a | 31 583 ab | 80.9 a | 34.39 a | 8 450.8 a |
N2 | 220.2 a | 143.2 a | 31 525 b | 80.8 a | 34.14 a | 8 221.5 ab | |
N3 | 224.4 a | 136.3 b | 30 283 c | 80.1 ab | 34.13 a | 8 128.7 b | |
N4 | 223.8 a | 144.4 a | 32 360 a | 79.2 b | 33.15 b | 8 032.6 b | |
平均值Average | 222.3 | 141.8 | 31 437 | 80.3 | 33.95 | 8 208.4 | |
F值F- value | C | 31.70* | 48.48* | 533.2** | 33.00* | 21596.1** | 95.97* |
N | 3.43 | 5.86* | 4.79* | 8.76** | 41.30** | 7.52** | |
C×N | 2.07 | 0.12 | 3.17 | 1.27 | 1.74 | 0.43 |
表6 氮素穗肥运筹对产量及其构成因子的影响
Table 6 Effects of nitrogen application for panicle initiation on grain yield and its component.
品种 Cultivar | 穗肥运筹 Nitrogen application for panicle initiation | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 No. of spiklets per panicle | 总颖花量 Total spikelets /(×104·hm-2) | 结实率 Seed-setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 实际产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | N1 | 228.0 b | 162.4 a | 37 027 a | 87.6 a | 31.31 a | 9 652.9 a |
N2 | 228.6 b | 159.3 a | 36 529 a | 86.4 a | 30.88 b | 9 295.3 b | |
N3 | 240.6 a | 151.8 b | 36 371 a | 84.9 b | 30.56 bc | 9 109.9 b | |
N4 | 231.0 b | 158.8 a | 36 609 a | 84.8 b | 30.01 c | 9 068.0 b | |
平均值Average | 232.1 | 158.2 | 36 634 | 85.9 | 30.69 | 9 281.5 | |
C2 | N1 | 220.8 a | 143.5 a | 31 583 ab | 80.9 a | 34.39 a | 8 450.8 a |
N2 | 220.2 a | 143.2 a | 31 525 b | 80.8 a | 34.14 a | 8 221.5 ab | |
N3 | 224.4 a | 136.3 b | 30 283 c | 80.1 ab | 34.13 a | 8 128.7 b | |
N4 | 223.8 a | 144.4 a | 32 360 a | 79.2 b | 33.15 b | 8 032.6 b | |
平均值Average | 222.3 | 141.8 | 31 437 | 80.3 | 33.95 | 8 208.4 | |
F值F- value | C | 31.70* | 48.48* | 533.2** | 33.00* | 21596.1** | 95.97* |
N | 3.43 | 5.86* | 4.79* | 8.76** | 41.30** | 7.52** | |
C×N | 2.07 | 0.12 | 3.17 | 1.27 | 1.74 | 0.43 |
[1] | Cassman K G, Peng S, Olk D C, Ladha J K, Reichardt W, Dobermann A, Singh U.Opportunities for increased nitrogen-use efficiency from improved resource management in irrigated rice systems.Field Crops Res, 1998, 56(1):7-39. |
[2] | 黄见良, 邹应斌, 彭少兵, Buresh R J.水稻对氮素的吸收、分配及其在组织中的挥发损失. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2004, 10(6):579-583. |
Huang J L, Zou Y B, Peng S B, Buresh R J.Nitrogen uptake, distribution by rice and its losses from plant tissues during.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2004, 10(6):579-583.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 丁艳锋, 赵长华, 王强盛. 穗肥施用时期对水稻氮素利用及产量的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2003, 26(4):5-8. |
Ding Y F, Zhao B H, Wang Q S.Effect of application stage of panicle fertilizer on rice grain yield and the utilization of nitrogen.J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2003, 26(4):5-8.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | Kamiji Y, Yoshida H, Palta J A, Sakuratani T, Shiraiwa T.N applications that increase plant N during panicle development are highly effective in increasing spikelet number in rice.Field Crops Res, 2011, 122(122):242-247. |
[5] | Jiang Q, Du Y, Tian X, Wang Q, Xiong R, Xu G, Yan C.Effect of panicle nitrogen on grain filling characteristics of high-yielding rice cultivars.Eur J Agron, 2015, 74:185-192. |
[6] | 李木英, 石庆华, 黄才立, 曾蕾, 潘晓华, 谭雪明. 穗肥运筹对超级杂交稻淦鑫688源库特征和氮肥效益的影响. 杂交水稻, 2010, 25(2):63-72. |
Li M Y, Shi Q H, Huang C L, Zeng L, Pan X H, Tan X M.Effects of nitrogen application of panicle fertilizer on source-sink characteristics and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency of super hybrid rice ganxin 688.Hybird Rice, 2010, 25(2):63-72.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 张镇铭, 姚金富, 邵达孚, 高莲英. 不同群体条件下穗肥施用量对水稻分蘖成穗的影响. 西南农业学报, 1998(S3):149-152. |
Zhang Z M, Yao J F, Shao D F, Gao L Y.Effect of application rates of ear manure on percentages of productive tiller at different rice population densities.Southwest China J Agric Sci, 1998(S3):149-152.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 凌启鸿, 张洪程, 蔡建中, 苏祖芳. 水稻不同叶龄期施用穗肥的研究. 扬州大学学报:农业与生命科学版, 1985, 6(3):11-19. |
Ling Q H, Zhang H C, Cai J Z, Su Z F.Study on using ear-fertilizer at different leaf-age-period in rice.J Yangzhou Univ: Agric. & Life Sci, 1985, 6(3):11-19.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 林忠成, 李土明, 吴福观, 张洪程, 戴其根, 叶世超, 郭宏文. 基蘖肥与穗肥氮比例对双季稻产量和碳氮比的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(2):269-275. |
Lin Z C, Li T M, Wu F G, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Ye S C, Guo H W.Effects of nitrogen application on yield and C/N of double-cropping rice.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2011, 17(2):269-275.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 付立东, 王宇, 隋鑫, 任海, 李旭, 李宝军. 氮素基蘖穗肥不同施入比例对超级稻生育及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2010, (5):34-38. |
Fu L D, Wang Y, Sui X, Ren H, Li X, Li B J.Effects of the different rate of nitrogen base-tiller and panicle fertilizer on development and yield of super rice. Crop Sci, 2010(5):34-38. | |
[11] | 凌启鸿, 张洪程, 戴其根, 丁艳锋, 凌励, 苏祖芳, 徐茂, 阙金华, 王绍华. 水稻精确定量施氮研究. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(12):2457-2467. |
Ling Q H, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Ding Y F, Ling L, Su Z F, Xu M, Que J H, Wang S H.Study on precise and quantitative N application in rice.Sci Agric Sin, 2005, 38(12):2457-2467.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 张洪程, 吴桂成, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 高辉, 魏海燕, 吕修涛, 万靓军, 黄银忠.水稻氮肥精确后移及其机制. 作物学报, 2011, 37(10):1837-1851. |
Zhang H C, Wu G C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Gao H, Wei H Y, Lv X T, Wan L J, Huang Y Z.Precise postponing nitrogen application and its mechanism in rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37(10):1837-1851.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 朴钟泽, 韩龙植, 高熙宗. 水稻不同基因型氮素利用效率差异. 中国水稻科学, 2003, 17(3):233-238. |
Piao Z Z, Han L Z, Koh H J.Variations of nitrogen use efficiency by rice genotype.Chin J Rice Sci, 2003, 17(3):233-238.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 殷春渊, 张庆, 魏海燕, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 马群, 杭杰, 张胜飞. 不同产量类型水稻基因型氮素吸收、利用效率的差异. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(1):39-50. |
Yin C Y, Zhang Q, Wei H Y, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Ma Q, Hang J, Zhang S F.Differences in nitrogen absorption and use efficiency in rice genotypes with different yield performance.Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43(1):39-50.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 董桂春, 王熠, 于小凤, 周娟, 彭斌, 李进前, 田昊, 张燕, 袁秋梅, 王余龙. 不同生育期水稻品种氮素吸收利用的差异. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(22):4570-4582. |
Dong G C, Wang Y, Yu X F, Zhou J, Peng B, Li J Q, Tian H, Zhang Y, Yuan Q M, Wang Y L.Differences of nitrogen uptake and utilization of conventional rice varieties with different growth duration.Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44(22):4570-4582. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 秦俭, 杨志远, 孙永健, 徐徽, 马均. 不同穗型杂交籼稻物质积累、氮素吸收利用和产量的差异比较. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(5):514-522. |
Qin J, Yang Z Y, Sun Y J, Xu H, Ma J.Differential comparison of assimilation products accumulation, nitrogen uptake and utilization and grain yield of hybrid indica rice cultivars with different panicle type. Chin J Rice Sci, 2014, 28(5):514-522.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 孙永健, 孙园园, 刘树金, 杨志远, 程洪彪, 贾现文, 马均. 水分管理和氮肥运筹对水稻养分吸收、转运及分配的影响. 作物学报, 2011, 37(12):2221-2232. |
Sun Y J, Sun Y Y, Liu S J, Yang Z Y, Cheng H B, Jia X W, Ma J.Effects of water management and nitrogen application strategies on nutrient absorption, transfer, and distribution in rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37(12):2221-2232.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 孙永健, 孙园园, 徐徽, 李玥, 严奉君, 蒋明金, 马均. 水氮管理模式对不同氮效率水稻氮素利用特性及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(9):1639-1649. |
Sun Y J, Sun Y Y, Xu H, Li Y, Yan F J, Jiang M J, Ma J.Effects of water-nitrogen management patterns on nitrogen utilization characteristics and yield in rice cultivars with different nitrogen use efficiencies.Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(9):1639-1649. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 陈惠哲, 朱德峰, 林贤青, 张玉屏. 穗肥施氮量对水稻剑叶生长及披垂的影响. 西南农业学报, 2007, 20(6):1246-1249. |
Chen H Z, Zhu D F, Lin X Q, Zhang Y P.Effect of amount of spike nitrogen application on growth and droop of flag leave in rice.Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2007, 20(6):1246-1249.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 凌启鸿.水稻精确定量栽培理论与技术. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2007. |
Ling Q H.Theory and technology of rice precise and quantitative cultivation. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007.(in Chinese) | |
[21] | 许乃霞, 杨益花, 苏祖芳. 抽穗后水稻株型与高光效群体形成关系的研究.耕作与栽培, 2009(5):17-19. |
Xu N X, Yang Y H, Su Z F.Study on the relationship between rice plant type after heading stage and high photosynthetic efficiency population formation.Cult Plant, 2009(5):17-19.(in Chinese) | |
[22] | 陈惠哲, 朱德峰, 林贤青, 张玉屏, 张卫星. 促花肥施氮对超级杂交稻冠层叶片生长及光合速率的影响. 湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 33(5):617-621. |
Chen H Z, Zhu D F, Lin X Q, Zhang Y P, Zhang W X.Effect of nitrogen application for spikelet promotion on growth and photosynthetic rate of canopy leaves in super hybrid rice.J Hunan Agric Univ: Nat Sci, 2007, 33(5):617-621.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 闫川, 丁艳峰, 王强盛, 李刚华, 刘正辉, 缪小建, 郑永美, 魏广彬, 王绍华. 穗肥施量对水稻植株形态、群体生态及穗叶温度的影响. 作物学报, 2008, 34(12): 2176-2183. |
Yan C, Ding Y F, Wang Q S, Li G H, Liu Z H, Miu X J, Zheng Y M, Wei G B, Wang S H.Effect of panicle fertilizer application rate on morphological, ecological characteristics, and organ temperature of rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(12): 2176-2183.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 吕腾飞, 周伟, 孙永健, 朱懿, 严奉君, 杨志远, 马均. 不同秧龄和氮肥运筹对杂交籼稻株型的影响. 浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版, 2015, 41(2):169-178. |
Lv T F, Zhou W, Sun Y J, Zhu Y, Yan F J, Yang Z Y, Ma J.Effects of different transplanting seedling ages and nitrogen managements on plant type of indica hybrid rice. J Zhejiang Univ :Agric & Life Sci, 2015, 41(2): 169-178.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 李艳大, 汤亮, 张玉屏, 朱相成, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 水稻冠层光截获与叶面积和产量的关系. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(16):3296-3305. |
Li Y D, Tang L, Zhang Y P, Zhu X C, Cao W X, Zhu Y.Relationship of PAR interception of canopy to leaf area and yield in rice.Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43(16): 3296-3305.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 吕川根, 邹江石. 两个超级杂交稻与汕优63光合株型的比较分析. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(6):633-639. |
Lv C G, Zou J S.Comparative analysis on plant type of two super hybrid rice and shanyou 63.Sci Agric Sin, 2003, 36(6):633-639.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 任亮, 郑家奎, 蒋强. 长江上游地区高产杂交水稻品种部分株型因子及生理特征研究. 西南农业学报, 2008, 21(6):1551-1554. |
Ren L, Zhen J K, Jiang Q.Studies on some plant type components and physiological characteristics of high-yielding hybrid rice in upstream of Yangtze river.Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2008, 21(6):1551-1554.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 孟天瑶,李晓芸,李超, 韦还和, 史天宇, 马荣荣, 王晓燕, 杨筠文, 戴其根, 张洪程.甬优系列籼粳杂交稻中熟高产品系的株型特征. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(2):170-180. |
Meng T Y, Li X Y, Li C, Wei H H, Shi T Y, Ma R R, Wang X Y, Yang J W, Dai Q G, Zhang H C.Plant-type characteristics of high-yielding Lines of yongyou japonica/indica hybrid rice with medium maturity. Chin J Rice Sci, 2016, 30(2):170-180.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 任志奇, 薛可欣, 董铮, 李小湘, 黎用朝, 郭玉静, 刘文强, 郭梁, 盛新年, 刘之熙, 潘孝武. 水稻外卷叶突变体ocl1的鉴定及基因定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 337-346. |
[2] | 肖乐铨, 李雷, 戴伟民, 强胜, 宋小玲. 转cry2A*/bar基因水稻与杂草稻杂交后代的苗期生长特性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 347-358. |
[3] | 李刚, 高清松, 李伟, 张雯霞, 王健, 程保山, 王迪, 高浩, 徐卫军, 陈红旗, 纪剑辉. 定向敲除SD1基因提高水稻的抗倒性和稻瘟病抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[4] | 汪胜勇, 陈宇航, 陈会丽, 黄钰杰, 张啸天, 丁双成, 王宏伟. 水稻减数分裂期高温对苯丙烷类代谢及下游分支代谢途径的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 368-378. |
[5] | 黄亚茹, 徐鹏, 王乐乐, 贺一哲, 王辉, 柯健, 何海兵, 武立权, 尤翠翠. 外源海藻糖对粳稻品系W1844籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[6] | 董立强, 杨铁鑫, 李睿, 商文奇, 马亮, 李跃东, 隋国民. 株行距配置对超高产田水稻产量及根系形态生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[7] | 高欠清, 任孝俭, 翟中兵, 郑普兵, 吴源芬, 崔克辉. 头季穗肥和促芽肥对再生稻再生芽生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[8] | 韩聪, 何禹畅, 吴丽娟, 郏丽丽, 王磊, 鄂志国. 水稻碱性亮氨酸拉链(bZIP)蛋白家族功能研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 436-448. |
[9] | 沈雨民, 陈明亮, 熊焕金, 熊文涛, 吴小燕, 肖叶青. 水稻内外稃异常发育突变体blg1 (beak like grain 1)的表型分析与精细定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 225-232. |
[10] | 段敏, 谢留杰, 高秀莹, 唐海娟, 黄善军, 潘晓飚. 利用CRISPR/Cas9技术创制广亲和水稻温敏雄性不育系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 233-243. |
[11] | 程玲, 黄福钢, 邱一埔, 王心怡, 舒宛, 邱永福, 李发活. 籼稻材料570011抗褐飞虱基因的遗传分析及鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 244-252. |
[12] | 王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[13] | 刘嫒桦, 李小坤. 不同肥料施用与稻米品质关系的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 276-284. |
[14] | 杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[15] | 魏晓东, 宋雪梅, 赵凌, 赵庆勇, 陈涛, 路凯, 朱镇, 黄胜东, 王才林, 张亚东. 硅锌肥及其施用方式对南粳46产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||